MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ARCHITECTURE ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎‎‎‎‎SPRING 2023

Image
Header
Image
Header
Image
Header

GRADUATE RESEARCH DESIGN STUDIO II
Diana Agrest, The Irwin S. Chanin Distinguished Professor

The Body: Corporeal Boundaries and Spatial Intersections
The subject of the body has deep roots in Western architecture theories from the texts of the Renaissance reading of Vitruvius. From Alberti to Francesco di Giorgio Martino and Filarete, the body has been a referent, a tool, and a construction in which the body (of man) is both a metaphoric and a metonymic construction having perfect proportions and harmony based on nature in whole and in part. We can fast-forward to the culture of disembodiment brought about as a result of cybernetics, information, mediatization, and in general, virtual reality, in a world that is nothing but simulacrum and in which the body becomes in its many forms of representation a simulacrum itself.

In the long stretch in between there are all forms of Western architectural constructions of the body from Ernst Neufert’s Architects’ Data of 1936 to The Modulor by Le Corbusier of 1945 and 1955. One could certainly say a lot about these socially biased narratives of control of the body in space as they relate to the body as a machine in a prevailing technocratic ideology, and the body as a tool for the consumption and control of the space of habitation. But breaking the limits of those inherited approaches, one must ask what body is the body in question?

And then there is the question of the places and spaces affected by and/or affecting the body and institutionalized modes of control and restriction—or one could look at the body, in its corporeality and the pushing of the limits of the body itself in extreme environmental conditions under water or in outer space or in rock climbing or cave explorations or in competitive sports as seen in the Olympics. Or the overcoming of its boundaries through the means of possible extensions, from those related to the senses to parts of the entire body through the possibilities afforded by constantly changing and advancing technologies that have gone from the mechanical to the digital. This includes all forms of prosthetic devices, some remedial and some just expansive per se in a cyborgian transformation as Haraway so vividly prognosticated. Or the body relative to the myriad organisms that interact with it and affect it from within and from without, as the body relates to questions under the general rubric of health and the many different modes the body/machine interaction is once more enacted.

But again, what body? The question is that of difference as opposed to the universalization of an abstract (male) body—differences of all kinds, from genetic to cultural, including questions of sex, gender, race or ethnicity, the labeling of bodies, but which in fact touch on the most profound forces that travel through fluids and synapses traversing the whole body in billions of possible routes, rhythms, and outcomes, each unique. This includes the transformation of the body in the process of reproduction, all this in its counterintuitive packaging.

But this body is affected if not completely determined by socio-political, economic, cultural, ideological, and physical environments and enacted in diverse places and modes habitation—from the physical body to a culture of disembodiment, in the cyberspace we inhabit, exacerbated at the present time.

This studio approaches the question of what bodies are we talking about, where are these bodies, and how are those boundaries and spatial intersections enacted in articulations and intersecting boundaries from a critical perspective. This exploration was developed in specific contexts in which students found their own individual interests and narratives addressing both the body itself and the environments where they operate as a creative and seamless process with no separation between research and project in which questions of representation have an essential role.


< Back to Selected Graduate Design Studio Projects

Projects

  • Founded by inventor, industrialist and philanthropist Peter Cooper in 1859, The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art offers education in art, architecture and engineering, as well as courses in the humanities and social sciences.

  • “My feelings, my desires, my hopes, embrace humanity throughout the world,” Peter Cooper proclaimed in a speech in 1853. He looked forward to a time when, “knowledge shall cover the earth as waters cover the great deep.”

  • From its beginnings, Cooper Union was a unique institution, dedicated to founder Peter Cooper's proposition that education is the key not only to personal prosperity but to civic virtue and harmony.

  • Peter Cooper wanted his graduates to acquire the technical mastery and entrepreneurial skills, enrich their intellects and spark their creativity, and develop a sense of social justice that would translate into action.